Friday, June 24, 2011

nios enamorados

images Hoy levanto nios enamorados. nios enamorados. patchwork
  • nios enamorados. patchwork


  • TelanganaINDIA
    10-04 10:55 PM
    I am planning to go to India with my family in december. Please suggest some tourist spots across India.
    Not the usual ones like tajmahal or gateway of india etc. Thank you.




    wallpaper nios enamorados. patchwork nios enamorados. de nios enamorados. pareja
  • de nios enamorados. pareja


  • mallu
    02-10 05:25 PM
    India EB with PD 1999 - How many pending ?
    India EB with PD 2000 - How many pending ?
    India EB with PD 2001- How many pending ?
    India EB with PD 2002- How many pending ?
    ......
    For USCIS it might be just the tap of a button to tell the numbers. All computerized , right ?




    nios enamorados. pictures niños enamorados con todos ni os enamorados. dos enamorados de
  • pictures niños enamorados con todos ni os enamorados. dos enamorados de


  • redViper
    04-28 08:44 AM
    cybergold




    2011 de nios enamorados. pareja nios enamorados. girlfriend Los niños enamorados ni os enamorados. en el que os conocisteis,
  • girlfriend Los niños enamorados ni os enamorados. en el que os conocisteis,


  • PDOCT05
    10-29 11:42 AM
    What does your lawyer say? It is clearly not USCIS error. Therefore, if they stick to their policy, if re-filed case does not have PD current, they will reject it for "PD not current". If they are generous, and your lawyer explains in some tactical way, they may accept it.

    If it is your lawyer's fault, you can take appropriate action with him.

    It's lawyer's fault ..he didn't check the application clearly.He said he is going to deal with it in a tactical way.I will wait for another notice from USCIS and then will take action on my lawyer. I am not going to leave him..:)

    Thanks,



    more...

    nios enamorados. patchwork niños enamorados
  • patchwork niños enamorados


  • absaarkhan
    06-12 05:54 PM
    What is "Letter of Acquirement’

    Can you please tell me what is "Letter of Acquirement’'

    My company is Acquired too, the New Employer just gave me a Letter Copy
    explaining the Merger, NO Official docs were shared with me.

    From whom did u get this letter.


    No need of new H1 if company 'B's' HR has agreed to continue with 'A''s employees.
    1. Get a EVL letter from company 'B'. (This is assuming name of 'A' will change to 'B' or new name.

    2. You need to get a "Letter of Acquirement" from HR of new company (I am assuming that the name of the company is changing as well). If name does not change then you should be fine. If you have to travel out of US, you need to carry latest copy of EVL(of new company) and "Letter of Acquirement" along with you. (I went thru these few years back, PwCC bought over by IBM, immediately after the takeover I travelled out of US and came back without any problems(on H1)) this was quite a while back though, you may want to check with your company attorney though.

    Note:
    "Letter of Acquirement’ would state that your 'A' company was bought over by 'B' company on Date and name has now changed to 'B'.

    Good luck.

    GCCovet




    nios enamorados. house que lindos niños enamorados! nios enamorados. ESCRITA 1948 (Postales -
  • house que lindos niños enamorados! nios enamorados. ESCRITA 1948 (Postales -


  • gbof
    06-03 06:09 PM
    Hi All,
    My company applied 485 and h1b. I am in AOS status and having EAD. My company laid off me on March and they are not revoke my h1b and 140(they may hire me back once get new job). Mean time shall i work hourly job and get around $1200 per month with same job description with using my EAD(new company will run payroll and W2). Also i am keep looking permanent full time job with my higher salary.

    For the hourly job they asking to fill I-9(employment eligibility verification will inform USCIS). On that form asking my A# with EAD expiration date.

    Is there a chance USCIS will know my hourly job?. My concern - this hourly job will create a problem for my GC process (chance to get REF) because rate is low

    Please give me your valuable suggestion

    Thanks

    Sorry for your situition and I wish you good luck in finding job. It is hard to survice and maintain legal status in current economy. Are you really without job since mar09 ?. My understanding on this is : for the primary-AOS big salary cut or raise can become a issue later.

    Guys, please, throw some light if there is any time limit for primary-AOS to get a job to stay in status?



    more...

    nios enamorados. como niños enamorados.
  • como niños enamorados.


  • glores1970
    09-23 12:06 PM
    I am in the same boat, changed my mind to apply for AP in the last minute and mailed my application on Aug 16th, USPS messed it up and couldn't deliver it on Aug 17th, tried delivering it on 18th but didnt since offices were closed finally delivered it on 20th.

    Now my AP application got rejected citing that I should have applied with new fee of $305 starting July 30th.

    What is confusing is where does it says post marked by Aug 17th? I thought USCIS had to receive it by Aug 17th.

    write the following on the envlope using marker
    DO NOT OPEN IN THE MAIL ROOM

    and address the package to director of the service center also include the evidance that you have applied when the visa bulliten is current

    Thanks, pathmaker and averagedesi...i will resend the application according to your suggestions.




    2010 pictures niños enamorados con todos ni os enamorados. dos enamorados de nios enamorados. Hoy levanto
  • Hoy levanto


  • indianabacklog
    12-04 03:40 PM
    I fail to see why these cases you are referring to are any worse off than many others.

    I filed my I485 in May 2007, have been current for more than a third of the interim period and still waiting.

    I have filed two service requests, two congressional enquiries and nothing. So have other people and it has not helped them either.

    We are all in a black hole hoping for our cases to see the light of day some time just like the WAC cases you refer to.



    more...

    nios enamorados. house niños enamorados. nios enamorados. niños enamorados
  • house niños enamorados. nios enamorados. niños enamorados


  • chanduv23
    10-13 07:37 AM
    Jaime - my friend - I am in for another rally. What worries me is that, there is still a lack of motivation from the immigrant community. We need atleast 50,000 skilled workers rallying in DC.




    hair girlfriend Los niños enamorados ni os enamorados. en el que os conocisteis, nios enamorados. Día de los Enamorados
  • Día de los Enamorados


  • gc28262
    12-17 08:22 AM
    Even in today's condition, you are legally clear. Why didn't company cancel the H1 ? That is company's problem. You don't have to worry about it.

    IMO most likely you can get in to the country without an issue. It is worth giving a try.

    Also see this uscis link

    Q : Must an H-1B alien be working at all times? (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=a62bec897643f010VgnVCM1000000ecd190aRCR D&vgnextchannel=1847c9ee2f82b010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD)



    more...

    nios enamorados. 2011 Niños enamorados del planeta; ni os enamorados. imagenes de ni os
  • 2011 Niños enamorados del planeta; ni os enamorados. imagenes de ni os


  • vmetla
    07-30 07:48 PM
    Hi All,

    I received an RFE based on my qualification and the Job requirement qualification.

    While applying for PERM, in the ETA 9089 form, Attorney mistakenly listed as below

    1. Accepted / Required Bachelors Degree for the Posted Job:
    Computer Science, Mathematics (Instead of Mathematics, it should have been Engineering)
    2. Any Other Alternate Degree accepted:
    NO

    And in my profile, he listed the degree as ENGINEERING.

    Now during the I-140 stage, i got an RFE based on this mismatch. Here is the verbiage.

    The USCIS is requesting evidence that the beneficiary obtained a Bachelor�s Degree in Computer Science or Mathematics, OR evidence that the degree obtained was part of the Computer Science or Mathematics program/department.

    MY Attorney Suggested 2 things.

    1. Get my degree transcripts evaluated by a third party educational evaluator and equate the courses i have done (7 Computer Courses and 9 Mathematics courses) as part of Computer Science / Mathematics Degree.

    2. Get an verification letter from the University that these courses are infact related to Computer Science / Mathematics Degree.

    Please let me know if i stand any chance with these 2 options.




    hot patchwork niños enamorados nios enamorados. los niños enamorados
  • los niños enamorados


  • chanduv23
    06-12 04:30 PM
    This is my first post, so bear with me.

    I also got a Status Update message via email from USCIS. I think the lawyer will be getting the papers in mail next week.

    Seems like USCIS has started sending RFE for a lot of us, who have been waiting for a long time. What might be the reason for this. I heard from some of my friends that they are pre-adjucating the cases so that when the visa dates are available, they can process faster, but I also wonder if they are doing it so that they can drop some cases who do NOT reply to their RFE (similar to what happenned with Backlog Elimination Center and 45 day letters).

    It is called "two birds in one shot". Pre-adjudication and pre-rejection.

    And yes, the reason why most people get RFEs is because the records may not be available properly due to clerical issues.

    Preadjudication follows these guidlines
    (1) If it is deniable - can some reason be found to deny this case? Deny it - can be resolved thropugh MTR
    or
    (2) Is it RFEable - can we issue a standardRFE for this case? - Issue RFE
    or
    Preadjudicate it and keep it ready for visa allocation.



    more...

    house Alter + Niños Enamorados XD | Flickr - Photo Sharing! nios enamorados. imagenes de nios enamorados. Alter + Niños Enamorados XD | Flickr - Photo
  • imagenes de nios enamorados. Alter + Niños Enamorados XD | Flickr - Photo


  • desi3933
    08-28 03:58 PM
    sucker

    That is your frustration talking. :D :D :D

    Hope you are feeling *better* after venting out your frustration.




    tattoo house que lindos niños enamorados! nios enamorados. ESCRITA 1948 (Postales - nios enamorados. pareja de enamorados.
  • pareja de enamorados.


  • Legal_In_A_Limbo
    01-14 05:10 PM
    Thats good to know that lots of people have done this.
    If someone can share their experience that will be great.

    It is the first contract between Company (B) and my husbands company (A). Above all my husband himself found this project.

    Above all, the contract between Company (B) and Company (A) does not mention the end client name, and the contract seems to be a general contract, basically saying that my husband is rendering services to Company (B).

    I will really appreciate all the help and guidance.



    more...

    pictures como niños enamorados. nios enamorados. Amores de niños, de jóvenes
  • Amores de niños, de jóvenes


  • greyhair
    06-21 09:31 AM
    In 2001, Congress passed a bill called American Competitiveness for 21st Century. This bill recaptured all unused/wasted green cards between 1992 to 2000. These recaptured green card numbers were suppose to be applied for EB by distributing them from 2001 to 2005. As the result starting 2001 you see higher than 140K green cards numbers allocated. However, those additional green cards which were suppose to be applied starting 2001 were wasted, in addition to the green card numbers in 2006 and 2007. Also, my understanding of the law is that if in an year, green number is not utilized in FB, in the last quarter of the year that green card visa number could flow to EB . Likewise, if a green card number is not utilized in EB, in the last quarter the unused green card could flow to FB.

    I read on this forum that starting 2001 (after the unused visa numbers were captured the last time) the total of these unused/wasted green card numbers from EB + FB is around 316K. Hope this clarifies your question.

    But don't count on any new law to recapture green card visas outside of CIR. It is not going to happen. IV core team said that the administration, and both Republican and Democratic lawmakers are opposed to do anything outside of CIR.

    Here is today's news in Politico indicating the same thing -
    Jon Kyl: Obama holding border 'hostage' - Andy Barr - POLITICO.com (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0610/38789.html)

    If Administration can tie high profile subject such as border security with CIR, is there any chance that lawmakers will let Recapture through (outside of CIR)? I don't think so.



    I have often heard about visa recapture in these forums, and always that there were lost visa numbers. I came across a DHS site yesterday with statstics on GCs issued, and must admit I am a bit confused about what visa recapture means. The site is DHS | Yearbook of Immigration Statistics: 2009 (http://www.dhs.gov/files/statistics/publications/LPR09.shtm) . Looking at table 6 (Persons Obtaining Legal Permanent Resident Status by Type and Major Class of Admission: Fiscal Years 2000 to 2009), we get the following data on EB and FB issuances.

    Year 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total
    FB 235,092 231,699 186,880 158,796 214,355 212,970 222,229 194,900 227,761 211,859 2,096,541
    EB 106,642 178,702 173,814 81,727 155,330 246,877 159,081 162,176 166,511 144,034 1,574,894
    Total 341,734 410,401 360,694 240,523 369,685 459,847 381,310 357,076 394,272 355,893 3,671,435


    if we we were to take deltas from the fb cap of 226k and eb cap of 140k, the scenario looks as follows, where a -ive number indicates over allocation.

    Year 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total
    FB -9,092 -5,699 39,120 67,204 11,645 13,030 3,771 31,100 -1,761 14,141 163,459
    EB 33,358 -38,702 -33,814 58,273 -15,330 -106,877 -19,081 -22,176 -26,511 -4,034 -174,894
    Total 24,266 -44,401 5,306 125,477 -3,685 -93,847 -15,310 8,924 -28,272 10,107 -11,435

    As we can see, cumulatively from 2000-09, 11,435 more visas have been given than actually permitted. Particularly in EB 174k excess visas were given.

    I'm curious to know, what recapture means, when it seems visas have not been lost.

    The only case for recapture is if we only count the years visas were under allocated, and ignore the years it was overallocated. The scenario would look as follows

    Year 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total
    FB 0 0 39,120 67,204 11,645 13,030 3,771 31,100 0 14,141 180,011
    EB 33,358 0 0 58,273 0 0 0 0 0 0 91,631
    Total 33,358 0 39,120 125,477 11,645 13,030 3,771 31,100 0 14,141 271,642

    So are we trying to recapture 271k visas from this calculation?

    If the experts could shed some light on this, that would be great.




    dresses los niños enamorados nios enamorados. Niños enamorados – Taringa!
  • Niños enamorados – Taringa!


  • ss1026
    11-04 11:43 AM
    Hey this is good news, atleast the crowd will get reduced in chennai consulate :)

    Yes, that will help the chennai consulate lines. And it is great for hyderabadis since we don't have to go to chennai, sometimes multiples times for a single stamping.



    more...

    makeup house niños enamorados. nios enamorados. niños enamorados nios enamorados. Alter + Niños Enamorados XD | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
  • Alter + Niños Enamorados XD | Flickr - Photo Sharing!


  • krassib
    06-03 11:57 AM
    Berkleybee,

    Thanks for the sample email2. I am going to talk with HR on Monday to post it. The branch that I work in has many graduates that I beleive are on H1-B status. I have to convince them that they are about to face retrogression problems some day.

    Krassib
    Yorba Linda, California




    girlfriend pareja de enamorados. nios enamorados. enamorados. éramos niños
  • enamorados. éramos niños


  • Blog Feeds
    02-05 06:40 PM
    AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:



    By Eleanor Pelta, AILA First Vice President

    H-1B workers certainly seem to be under fire these days on many fronts. A new memo issued by USCIS on the employer-employee relationship imposes new extra-regulatory regulations on the types of activities in which H-1B workers can engage as well as the types of enterprises that can petition for H-1B workers. The memo targets the consulting industry directly, deftly slips in a new concept that seems to prohibit H-1B petitions for employer-owners of businesses, and will surely constitute an open invitation to the Service Centers to hit H-1B petitioners with a new slew of kitchen-sink RFE's. On another front, USCIS continues to make unannounced H-1B site visits, often repeatedly to the same employer. Apart from the "in-terrorem" impact of such visits, I personally cannot see the utility of three different visits to the same employer, particularly after the first one or two visits show that the employer is fully compliant.

    But USCIS isn't the only agency that is rigorously targeting H-1B's. An AILA member recently reported that CBP pulled newly-arrived Indian nationals holding H-1B visas out of an immigration inspection line and reportedly placed them in Expedited Removal. The legal basis of those actions is still unclear. However, the tactic is too close to racial profiling for my own comfort.

    Finally, recent H-1B "skirmishes" include various U.S. consular posts in India issuing "pink letters" that are, simply put, consular "RFE's" appearing to question the bona fides of the H-1B and requesting information on a host of truly repetitive and/or irrelevant topics. Much of the information that is routinely requested on a pink letter is already in the copy of the H-1B visa petition. Some of the letters request payroll information for all employees of the sponsoring company, a ridiculous request in most instances, particularly for major multi-national companies. One of the most frustrating actions we are seeing from consular officers in this context is the checking off or highlighting of every single category of additional information on the form letter, whether directly applicable or not, in effect a "paper wall" that must be overcome before an applicant can have the H-1B visa issued. Very discouraging to both employer and employee.

    How have we come to a point in time where the H-1B category in and of itself is so disdained and mistrusted? Of course I'm aware that instances of fraud have cast this category in a bad light. But I think that vehemence of the administrative attack on the H-1B category is so disproportionate to the actual statistics about fraud. And interestingly, the disproportionate heavy-handed administrative reaction comes not from the agency specifically tasked with H-1B enforcement�the Department of Labor�but from CIS, CBP and State. Sometimes I just have to shake my head and ask myself what makes people so darn angry about a visa category that, at bottom, is designed to bring in relatively tiny number of really smart people to work in U.S. businesses of any size. It has to be a reaction against something else.

    Yes, a great number of IT consultants come to the US on H-1B's. It is important to remember that so many of these individuals are extremely well-educated, capable people, working in an industry in which there are a large number of high profile players. And arguably, the high profile consulting companies have the most at stake if they do not focus on compliance, as they are the easiest enforcement target and they need their business model to work in the U.S. in order to survive. Some people may not like the business model, although arguably IT consulting companies provide needed services that allow US businesses, such as banks and insurance companies to focus on their own core strengths. Like it or not, though, this business model is perfectly legal under current law, and the agencies that enforce our immigration laws have no business trying to eviscerate it by policy or a pattern of discretionary actions.

    It is true that some IT consulting companies' practices have been the focus of fraud investigations. But DOL has stringent rules in place to deal with the bad guys. Benching H-1B workers without pay, paying below the prevailing wage, sending H-1B workers on long-term assignments to a site not covered by an LCA�these are the practices we most often hear about, and every single one of these is a violation of an existing regulation that could be enforced by the Department of Labor. When an employer violates wage and hour rules, DOL investigates the practices and enforces the regulations against that employer. But no one shuts down an entire industry as a result.

    And the IT consulting industry is not the only user of the H-1B visa. Let's not forget how many other critical fields use H-1B workers. In my own career alone, I have seen H-1B petitions for nanoscientists, ornithologists, CEO's of significant not for profit organizations, teachers, applied mathematicians, risk analysts, professionals involved in pharmaceutical research and development, automotive designers, international legal experts, film editors, microimaging engineers. H-1B's are valuable to small and large businesses alike, arguably even more to that emerging business that needs one key expert to develop a new product or service and get the business off the ground.


    The assault on H-1B's is not only offensive, it's dangerous. Here's why:




    H-1B's create jobs�statistics show that 5 jobs are created in the U.S. for every H-1B worker hired. An administrative clamp-down in the program will hinder this job creation. And think about the valuable sharing of skills and expertise between H-1B workers and U.S. workers�this is lost when companies are discouraged from using the program.
    The anti-H-1B assault dissuades large businesses from conducting research and development in the US, and encourages the relocation of those facilities in jurisdictions that are friendlier to foreign professionals.
    The anti-H-1B assault chills the formation of small businesses in the US, particularly in emerging technologies. This will most certainly be one of the long-term results of USCIS' most recent memo.
    The attack on H-1B's offends our friends and allies in the world. An example: Earlier this year India �one of the U.S.'s closest allies --announced new visa restrictions on foreign nationals working there. Surely the treatment of Indian national H-1B workers at the hands of our agencies involved in the immigration process would not have escaped the attention of the Indian government as they issued their own restrictions.
    The increasing challenges in the H-1B program may have the effect of encouraging foreign students who were educated in the U.S. to seek permanent positions elsewhere.
    Whatever the cause of the visceral reaction against H-1B workers might be�whether it stems from a fear that fraud will become more widespread or whether it is simply a broader reaction against foreign workers that often raises its head during any down economy �I sincerely hope that the agencies are able to gain some perspective on the program that allows them to treat legitimate H-1B employers and employees with the respect they deserve and to effectively enforce against those who are non-compliant, rather than casting a wide net and treating all H-1B users as abusers.
    https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-7575642888668204601?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com


    More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2010/02/why-is-h-1b-dirty-word.html)




    hairstyles 2011 Niños enamorados del planeta; ni os enamorados. imagenes de ni os nios enamorados. tattoo los niños comenzaron el
  • tattoo los niños comenzaron el


  • indrachat_75
    02-20 10:19 PM
    It is next week, correct ?

    Indraneel




    sheela
    07-13 08:52 PM
    Hi Everyone,

    Is it really necessary to inform USCIS of change of address.

    Do mails,notifications or cards from USCIS get forwarded to the new ADDRESS like all other mails.

    Will appreciate your views.

    It is a requirement. Download AR11 read and follow it




    Saralayar
    04-10 11:52 AM
    My EAD is going to expire in 3 months and I am filing for my renewal now. What can be done if you don't get the EAD renewal response before the expiry of the current one ?
    I heard somewhere, that if you don't receive the renewal notice within 60 days, then you can approach the local USCIS office and get a temporary EAD card for 90 days.
    Anybody knows more ?

    Also, generally do folks approach their lawyers for extension filing or they do it themselves?

    Thanks,
    ------------------------
    EB3 PD Mar 2003
    I-485, AP, EAD filed in July 07
    EAD expiring on July 31st 2008.

    [I posted this on another thread under "EAD Filing Fees" but it did not show up on the first page- hence reposting it...]
    It is a new EAD and not an extension of your old EAD. You can go online and e-file and there is no need for a lawyer. As you have all your GC details including your Alien #, it is very straight forward.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment